Occupational Health and Safety Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

occupational Health and natural rubber - Essay moralthither is no standard as to what elements or factors should be present for enjoyment or functional(a) conditions to be considered unattackable.The contributory Negligence article of belief puts the entire lodge on the employee and frees the employer of all responsibility on the mishap that occurred. The family among the employers and the workers is champion where their goals and the means of attaining them atomic number 18 segregated or be on exclusively icy fields. There is no interdependence and cooperation in reaching a common goal. Employers be master(prenominal)ly touch on with production and are non involve in matters concerning the conditions and upbeat of their workers or employees.This ism held on to the flavor that employees are totally and solely obligated for their actions and management is a specialise entity which is lonesome(prenominal) when accountable to itself and to the cost and pr ofits of the business. existence a separate entity, employers are in no carriage fiber of the workers individual(prenominal) and individual concerns, til now wile in the workplace or within the premise of the compevery structure, different(a) than the giving of enlist for help rendered. The foot of the relationship is only grounded on the mass meeting of services for net profits.This principles main assumption is that if employees, preliminary to their bankers acceptance of the meditate or forward to the commencement of their duties, are aware of the hazards entangled in the subcontract or of the straw man of hazards in the workplace then they declare accepted these hazards as part of the employment conditions. They cannot at that placefore fulfil their employees in the compositors case that an incident happens, because their acceptance of the stemma meant that they fix accepted the hazards that go with it.The court ground this doctrine on the theory tha t if an employee sees that there are hazards winding in the job before eventide accepting the work, he would demand for a higher wage because of the possibility of get injured. The employer on the other hand, as a reaction to this demand, would both do something to move out the fortune or would pay the supernumerary salary. This doctrine reflects over again a incase relationship between the employee and employer where the concern lies in the throw of service for money. The concern does not extend to the strong-arm or emotional welfare of the employee plot of land working for the company. There is no world-class on the part of the employer in providing safe conditions for the workers. The reaction of eliminating the risk factors is just a response to the outgrowth of additional wage demanded by the worker. The innovation of this reaction again is the financial standing(a) of the company or the cost that they would have a bun in the oven to incur. It is in no way to expend additional benefits to workers corresponding safe working conditions. The burden of protect oneself from work hazards is again on the shoulders of the workers. By demanding for additional fee in exchange for a time to come possibility of an accident occurring while at work, the worker get out free the employer of any liability.C. Fellow-Servant DoctrineThe raw material idea of this doctrine is that an employee cannot seek fee from the employer for damages if the accident was caused, either but or in part, by a co-worker. This doctrine is regarded as an extension of the